
Truth is I have an extremely irritating 'condition' that is fairly common, utterly dull and that kindly helped me go from "l would" to "well, she's quite pretty, until she gets her kit off". I don't have a problem with food. I don't binge eat and I haven't got a weird emotional relationship with it other than I like it a lot but, annoyingly, not very much of it makes me fat. And to be less fat, I have to work very fucking hard. So I have worked very very fucking hard, and in the last six weeks I've shifted about seventeen pounds, and found muscles I didn't know existed. (If you're wondering, my weight loss can be ascribed to that astonishing combination of eating less and moving around more.) So I was feeling quite perky about myself until I went to that centre of fashion excellence, Harvey Nichols.
Harvey Nichols is, if you don't know, a flash department store in Knightsbridge full of posh clothes and makeup and handbags that cost £2,300. I was there because they've got good clothes if you're like my best friend, who is 5ft 9, good-looking, and a size 10 (or sometimes 8). We went to look at things to buy for her to wear to her wedding. She bought something unutterably lovely that she looks really beautiful in, and that made me very happy.
But I felt miserable when I came out into the chilly afternoon. It's not like I have to buy all my clothes from specialist retailers for the larger lady, but I'd expect to be able to fondle a (UK) size 14 with a certain "it's only 4 months away" wistfulness. But in Harvey Nichols, the clothes on the racks only go up to a size 12, and that was obviously slightly obscene: the girl serving us described it as "very big". Down the road in Yves Saint Laurent they had a skirt that was so small I (genuinely) thought it was made for a child, and everything in Marc Jacobs seemed to be a size 4.
I'm not going to bother to go into what the media may or may not do to women. I can argue about who's most to blame, advertising or magazines, and I'm not sure there is an answer; both parties would, I've no doubt, say "we give people what they want". (Which is, incidentally, the tabloid newspapers' justification for what they do.) I'm not going to go into the social or sexual politics of it, quote Orbach, Paglia and Dworkin, tell you that over 50% of British women are over a size 16, that Nicole Richie looks shit that thin and will probably die soon if she carries on like that, that Victoria Beckham's waist size is the same as the average 10 year old girl and that only women over child-bearing age can afford those Marc Jacobs shirts in size 4. There's no point.
But I do know this: I will never, at 36, look good in a bikini. I will always have the very fine (and now, to my eyes, rather beautiful), silvery stretch marks on my tummy and arse. The best I can hope for is that I will be very fit one day, wear the clothes I want to wear, and that I won't have any bits that wobble or hang off. I'll be strong, able to run for half an hour without passing out, do cartwheels, climb trees, eat nice food, and die when I'm quite old. And that'll be good enough for me. As long as I avoid Harvey Nichols.
7 comments:
I know. Minging isn't it. And only £6. Bargain. xx
I sometimes go off on one about the stupid gag-inducing stick insect look, and before you know it I'm being lifted bodily by my upper arms by two swarthy gentlemen and ejected forcefully out of some sterile chrome-and-neon meat-market that will be replaced by a Starbucks in six months, with the warning "Don't spread that blasphemy in here, pal" echoing in my ears as my puss hits the wet pavement...so I'm not going to start ranting like that in your blog.
I'm just here to say good on you. If a few more thought like that, who knows what might happen.
Most think like that, Kav. And most also want to look like Teri Hatcher. Such are the mysteries of the female psyche.
I'd look weird if I were really skinny. Not like myself at all. I was built to wear 50s New Look frocks and deliver lambs (not at the same time). It's not like I look revolting, especially not now, but it all seems so utterly illogical, this lolly-pop lady look. (I forgot about the fashion market being run by tiny gay men in pirate headscarves, by the way.)
Funny though isn't it that however daft it seems (not as daft as footless tights, but I was assured yesterday that that's quite the thing at the moment), I read an 'article' last week about a new craze for personal trainers who make sure your body is completely symmetrical. I stood in front of the mirror positively panicking because my left hand side is weaker than my right hand side, which means that my right thigh may, for example, be an inch bigger than my left thigh. And that's ridiculous.
I'm a bit annoyed by this post in a way because it talks about things that are fascinating and very complicated in an incredibly over-simplistic way, but I figure that the only thing anyone can do (women in particular) is calm the fuck down. Otherwise it'd never end, and for me that could mean surgery and all sorts and never allowing myself to feel proud of myself for having achieved something it's taken me 12 years to sort out. Or, more to the point, actually enjoying life. (However cheesy that sounds.)
Doesn't matter anyway. Johnnyboy, I know you love me for my mind.
Cake, anyone?
"I figure that the only thing anyone can do (women in particular) is calm the fuck down"
this is quite possibly the sanest thing i have heard anyone say on this subject.
great post.
Urgh!!! Major ISP probs...been offline for 10 days...missed all the news and goss so catching up fast!! (Sacking BT for the record!)
Anywayyy.....fabulous post!! You're so right about the eating less and moving around a bit more thing...wtf can't people see that? In my case I am well aware of the theory I just "choose" not to do it...I took your advice a long time ago...calmed the fuck down and am just content being a size 14 (on a good day!)...geeez at 35 it's about time i got used to being me huh?
Mos def, Monkey Dearest. But also for your unmatched penguin portraiture.
Post a Comment